Inherit the Wind: Henry Drummond Essay

The authors, Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. lee(prenominal)s, principal(prenominal) purpose through Inherit the cast is proving that humans hold the function to hark back. enthalpy Drummond is vital in this discovery because of his plastered belief that one should hold this right. Drummonds hero archetype is the cause for his whole feelings, and he succeeds when convincing the audience of his beliefs by revealing the contradictions underlying his playfulnessnesses inherited ghostlike beliefs. Henry Drummond arrives in Hillsboro as an atheist, and leaves as a hero. The tgets concourses sign reaction to the news that Drummond is defending Cates, alerts the audience. This is almost app arnt when Melinda, a young girl, front inspects him and screams Its the Devil (Lawrence and Lee ). Drummond does non let the citizens miscons admittedlyd interpretation of him discriminate him from his goal, to take a arise. Drummond uses the case as an opportunity to fight for the right to think and develop ones own truths.Slowly the townspeople start to calculate through Brady and start to see the true Drummond. The Drummond who is committed to defending Cates and respectfulnesss Cates for stand up when everybody else is sitting down.(Lawrence and Lee ). Brady and Drummond ar alike in multiple ship canal such as their mutual respect for each other as wholesome as their past together, but there are also very probatory differences between them, such as their character. Drummonds reason to defend Cates is to share a message throughout the world as well as protect an unreserved man. Meanwhile Bradys purpose is to infer popularity throughout the world, and only to help himself. Bradys lack of dedication towards this case results in his downfall. In Act III of the play, the readers see Drummonds quick mind, his ability to put to work under pressure, and his creativity. When the judge refuses all of Drummonds witnesses he switches tactics and decides to call Brad y to the stand as an expert on the bible.Drummonds character serves as a pamper for Bradys character, Drummonds patient sort and open-minded, progressive elan of thinking accentuates Bradys narrow-minded stylus of thinking which causes the audiences deliver in his direction and opens their eyes to truth. The caput where the Drummonds point is finally make is when he stumps Brady. Drummonds cross-examination of Brady causes humiliation and hysteria. Brady self-destructs when his convictions active the literal truth of the Bible are questioned and proved false due to Drummond. Drummonds attack of Brady is non mean-spirited, it isdevastating. At the analogous time, the power of Drummonds attack stems not so much from Drummonds wit as from the weight of Bradys egotism, stubbornness, and arrogance.fundamentally if Brady was not so cocky and despotic he might have been qualified to prevent the case going the way it did. Although the trial in Inherit the crown concerns the batt le between creationism and evolutionism, a deeper impinge exists beneath the surface. Drummond points to this more basic relinquish when he asks his young witness Howard whether he believes in Darwin. When the boy responds that he hasnt made up his mind, Drummond insists that the boys immunity to thinkto make up his own mindis what is actually on trial. This point in the book is where Drummonds point becomes obvious freedom of judgment becomes the freedom to be wrong or to change ones mind. counterbalance though Cates is found guilty, Drummond wins a example victory. He reveals his integrity when he defends freedom of thought, even for those he disagrees with. When Hornbeck criticizes Brady and Bradys fundamentalistic beliefs, Drummond tells Hornbeck that . . . Brady had the same right as Cates the right to be wrong (Lawrence and Lee ) Drummonds hero archetype and his initial synopsis of Brady are the cause of his success with the people of Hillsboro. At the end of the play, Drummond feels the same way and is still fighting for peoples right to be wrong (Lawrence and Lee ).